Dan J. Harkey

Educator & Private Money Lending Consultant

My Soon-To-Be ex-Husband Applied for a Home Loan During Our Divorce

Trouble in Paradise

by Dan J. Harkey

Share This Article

Listen To This Article

Summary:

Actions have both positive and negative consequences; some are intended, while others are unintended.

Some actions are taken after critically analyzing the pros and cons, while others are taken with little or no conscious thought.  Still, others are taken out of ignorance or deviousness.

Despite his outward portrayal of sensitivity and understanding during the divorce, the soon-to-be ex-husband’s actions reveal a different truth.  His deceptive behavior, rather than his claimed empathy, defines him.

Article:

A Soon-to-be ex-husband decided to secure a loan for his home without informing his co-owner (soon-to-be ex-wife) while they were in the midst of a divorce.  This action, considering the couple jointly owns their residence, had significant legal implications.  It serves as a cautionary tale, a stark reminder of the potential consequences, such as invalidating the loan and the lender ending up with an unsecured claim not attached to the real property.

Repeatedly apologizing only resulted in a cold response while meeting at the park. A cozy and apologetic stroll while mutually occupying the park bench won’t work again.  Deception as a characteristic personality flaw is what got him there in the first place.

Under false assumptions, the husband assured the procuring mortgage broker that his ex-wife, who was still pending, would agree to the loan.  This miscommunication contributed to their divorce. Upon discovering the devious action, the wife refused to allow a lien to be placed on the home.  This serves as a stark reminder of the importance of clear communication and mutual understanding in such situations.  It’s crucial to ensure all parties are fully informed and can navigate the legal complexities of the loan process, empowering them to make informed decisions and feel prepared for potential challenges.

The savvy mortgage broker who would fund the loan on behalf of private investors said...

Trained to be skeptical in such situations, the savvy mortgage broker quickly questioned the viability of an ex-wife cooperating on anything but opening the door to the moving company to deliver his things out of her life.  There was suspicion instantly about the statement. My client is going through a divorce, and he has assured me that she will cooperate.  She will sign any necessary documents. They have a civil relationship.

The funding broker, a crucial player in the loan process, ensures all parties involved are fully informed and understand the legal complexities.  In this case, the husband’s misrepresentations and withholding of material facts had serious, life-altering consequences.  The broker’s role is to facilitate the loan and ensure that all parties are aware of the legal implications of their actions, thereby preventing potential legal issues.

The funding broker responded.

Yes, that may be true—that the wife will agree to cooperate.  However, before we undertake the extensive work (spinning our wheels) to process and fund this loan, we require written verification from the wife or her attorney that she will cooperate in signing the necessary documents for this transaction.  Oh darn,n ow what? The devious husband turns into a slithering snake, sliding out of the conversation.

Is there a pending settlement agreement in the divorce proceedings?  Is there a completed pro forma settlement agreement in which the ex-spouse has agreed to quit and claim their interest in the security property as part of the settlement? A legal stay is imposed once a petition is filed for dissolving the marriage, and no further actions to sell or refinance community property are possible without a court order. This legal stay is crucial to divorce as it prevents unilateral actions that could affect the joint property.

  • Understanding the court petition process is crucial for all parties involved.  It imposes a legally mandated stay, requiring court approval for any property sale or loan transaction.  This understanding ensures that all parties are fully informed and can navigate the legal complexities of the loan process.
  • A title insurer will also require a court order and a court-approved settlement agreement as a condition to provide title insurance coverage, further emphasizing the legal complexities and potential delays in the loan process. This example underscores the crucial importance of all parties involved in the divorce and loan process being fully aware of the legal process and their right. Understanding these legalities not only informs but also empowers individuals, enabling them to navigate the complexities of the loan process confidently.  By understanding the legal process, individuals can take control of their situation and make informed decisions, resulting in a smoother loan process and increased confidence in their actions.  If a lender makes a loan secured by this property and the documents are signed by only one party, the transaction will be voidable.  This means the loan could be invalidated, and the lender could end up with an unsecured claim not attached to the real property.  This real-life eexample highlightsthe importance of both parties taking responsibility and actively engaging in the loan process to ensure a smooth and legally valid transactio t also serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the potential consequences of not fully understanding the legal pprprocess   It is worth noting that awareness of these potential pitfalls is crucial to ensure a successful loan process and to make you feel cautious and informed.

I