Dan J. Harkey

Master Educator | Business & Finance Consultant | Mentor

Makers or Takers: America’s Crossroads

America was built on a foundation of self-reliance, innovation, and personal accountability. Yet today, we face a pressing cultural and economic shift: too many are being incentivized to become takers rather than makers. This isn’t just a financial problem—it’s a philosophical one that demands our immediate attention.

by Dan J. Harkey

Share This Article

Summary

When government programs expand without accountability, dependency becomes a rational choice. Why strive for self-sufficiency when benefits rival wages? Why innovate when the system rewards stagnation? Collectivism, once a safety net, risks becoming a hammock.

The solution isn’t to dismantle the safety net—it’s to restore balance.  Work must pay more than welfare. Education must teach financial literacy, entrepreneurship, and trade skills, not just theory. Policies should reward productivity, ownership, and risk-taking, while phasing out permanent dependency on government support.

Culturally, we need to celebrate creators, builders, and problem solvers—not dwell on victimhood.  Strong families, local communities, and private initiatives can do what bureaucracy cannot: foster accountability and dignity.

America thrives when individuals take responsibility for their future.  If we fail to reverse this trend, we risk trading liberty for comfort—and History shows that’s a bad bargain.  Each of us has a role to play in shaping our collective future.

America’s Crossroads: Makers or Takers?

America’s prosperity has never been a historical accident. It has been the predictable result of a culture that rewards self-reliance, hard work, ingenuity, and accountability—paired with a social ethic that extends a hand to those who fall behind. When that balance holds, freedom compounds into prosperity. When it breaks—when policy dulls incentives, bureaucracy smothers initiative, and we valorize dependency over effort—our engine stalls.

We’re closer to that stall than we were. The drift isn’t merely fiscal; it’s philosophical.  Over time, we built systems that make it rational for too many to opt out of production and opt into programs.  We celebrate redistribution more than creation, process over outcomes, and credentials over competence. The result is subtle but corrosive: a slow migration from a maker culture to a taker culture, from individual accountability to collectivist reflex. The question is not whether we care for the vulnerable—we must and we will—but whether our care is designed to restore agency or to sedate it.

Below are practical ways to re-center our economy and culture on making, without abandoning compassion.  These strategies offer a path to a brighter future, where self-reliance and accountability are once again celebrated.

1) Fix the Incentives: Make Work Pay, Always

People respond to incentives, and policies that overlook this fact often result in unintended harm.  “Benefits cliffs”—where a modest pay raise triggers a significant loss of assistance—can trap families in low-wage work or cause them to leave the workforce entirely. The remedy is not cruelty; it’s design. Phase-outs should be gradual, predictable, and transparent so that each additional dollar earned leaves families better off.

Prefer policies that reward earned income and on-ramps into work (e.g., wage subsidies, earned-income credits, and targeted training) over policies that raise the cost of hiring (e.g., blunt mandates that price out entry-level jobs)—pair work requirements for non-disabled adults with childcare, transit assistance, and rapid job placement. The goal is simple: a benefits system that acts like a trampoline—temporary support that propels people back onto their feet.

Principle: No program should punish work, marriage, savings, or skill-building.  If it does, redesign it.

2) Rebuild the Skills Pipeline: From Credentialism to Competence

We told a generation that a four-year degree is the only credible ticket to the middle class, then made that ticket more expensive and less predictive of job performance.  Meanwhile, trades—such as electricians, plumbers, machinists, HVAC technicians, and construction supervisors—face chronic shortages and offer high wages, low debt, and stable careers. A healthy maker culture honors those who build, repair, and produce—not just those who manage or theorize about it.

Secondary schools should embed financial literacy, entrepreneurship, and hands-on problem-solving into the core curriculum. States should champion apprenticeships, employer-led academies, and short-cycle credentials that map directly to high-demand roles. Employerss should shift from pedigree hiring to skills-based hiring, evaluating what a candidate can do rather than where they sat.

Principle: Measure learning by demonstrated competence; expand pathways where mastery—not seat time—drives opportunity.

3) Cut the Red Tape That Strangles the First Rung

For many would-be makers, the barrier isn’t motivation; it’s permission.  Occupational licensing regimes, zoning rules, and micro-regulatory thickets frequently protect incumbents and stifle entrants.  It should not take more training to braid hair or guide tourists than to become an EMT. Nor should young entrepreneurs need a lawyer to start a home-based business, a food cart, or a mobile service.

States should conduct independent “sunset and scrub” reviews—if a rule cannot justify its public-safety value relative to its economic drag, it should be pared back or repealed. Replace broad prohibitions with narrow, performance-based standards.  Encourage startup districts to adopt streamlined permitting and transparent, digital-by-default processes that average citizens can easily navigate.

Principle: Regulation should protect the public from harm, not protect the comfortable from competition.

4) Encourage Ownership: Align Workers With Enterprise

People behave differently when they have a stake in something.  That’s why ownership—home equity, small businesses, employee stock—has such powerful civic and economic effects. Policies that widen the ownership base strengthen both the maker ethic and the social fabric simultaneously.

Tax-advantaged employee ownership (ESOPs), profit-sharing, and broad-based equity grants can tie pay to productivity and reduce the “us vs. them” mindset between labor and capital.  Sensibly designed first-time homebuyer savings accounts, zoning reform that permits starter homes and missing-middle housing, and streamlined small-business formation can put more families on the ownership ladder.

Principle: The more people who own, the more people who build. Ownership turns bystanders into stewards.

5) Decentralize Aid, Localize Accountability

Bureaucracies measure inputs; communities measure outcomes. A federal dollar routed through multiple layers of administration loses focus and urgency—and too often, dignity.  Where possible, shift social programs to local actors with clear, public scorecards that include job placement within 90 days, sustained employment at six and twelve months, credential attainment, recidivism reduction, and sobriety maintenance.  Fund what works; sunset what doesn’t.

Another name does not abandon this. It’s a humility about what distant agencies can do and a respect for the knowledge of churches, nonprofits, mutual-aid networks, and local employers who are closer to the problem—and to the people.

Principle: Help should be human, proximate, and proven. Dollars should follow results, not rhetoric.

6) Restore the Cultural Grammar of Responsibility

Policy can set good conditions, but culture sets the default. If we repeatedly signal that effort is optional, victimhood is valorized, and outcomes are perceived as owed rather than earned, people eventually come to believe us.  The antidote is not shame. It’s honor—honoring the creators, fixers, caregivers, and builders who keep communities alive; honoring parents who put their kids’ future ahead of their own; honoring small business owners who risk what they have to create what doesn’t yet exist.

Media, schools, and civic leaders can do more than critique; they can curate examples worth emulating. Celebrate the apprentice who becomes a master, the re-entry worker who builds a career after prison, the single mom who finishes a certification and doubles her wage, the shop that trains teens for their first real job.  A civilization grows when it expands the circle of people who see themselves as responsible for a piece of it.

Principle: We become what we celebrate.

7) Confront Moral Hazard—With Compassion

Insurance exists because life is risky. However, insurance also creates a moral hazard: when someone else bears the cost of our choices, we tend to take more risks. Social policy can suffer the same flaw. The answer is not to remove the net; it’s to weave it thoughtfully—requiring reciprocal effort, preventing fraud, and insisting that the journey out of dependency is real, supported, and expected.

This balance requires moral clarity: society owes compassion, but individuals owe effort.  Where there are genuine barriers—addiction, disability, trauma—we invest intensively and intelligently.  Where there are choices, we reward the right ones and withdraw support when they’re persistently refused. Compassion without accountability breeds cynicism; accountability without compassion breeds cruelty.  We need both.

Principle: The safety net should be safe for those who fall, a net that guides them back to firm ground.

8) A Compact Worth Renewing

America’s success came from a social compact: you have the freedom to build, keep, and pass on the fruits of your work—and the responsibility to contribute, care for your own, and help your neighbor when he falls. The government protects that freedom and provides a floor, not a ceiling. Business creates opportunities and treats people as partners, not as costs. Families and communities transmit virtues that no statute can legislate.

We will not regulate our way into greatness, nor spend our way into dignity.  We will build our way there by reviving a culture where making is honored, ownership is widened, and help is designed to heal, not to hold.

The path is not mysterious:

  • Design benefits so work always wins.
  • Teach money, making, and mastery—not just theory.
  • Clear away the thicket that blocks new builders.
  • Spread ownership so more people have a stake.
  • Put aid close to the people and tie it to outcomes.
  • Celebrate responsibility and courage in public, not just controversy.

We can do all of this while remaining a generous nation. In fact, generosity that restores capacity is the most dignifying kind. The choice before us is whether we will continue to tilt toward a culture that numbs ambition—or reassert the ethos that made this country exceptional: freedom harnessed to responsibility, compassion disciplined by truth, and a steady belief that men and women, when trusted and expected to rise, usually do.

It’s time to build—makers first, with a safety net that helps people climb back onto the beam.